| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Mike's Ansel Adams Project

Page history last edited by michael.petrakis@richmond.edu 14 years, 6 months ago

Mike Petrakis

Dr Essid

English 103: Expository Writing

September 22nd, 2009

 

                                               

                                                “Clearing Winter Storm”

 

            A photographer's job is to create a work that draws out the emotions of the audience when they see the portrait. It is to make the audience feel the same emotions from the portrait as if they had seen the portrait in real life.  Ansel Adam’s portrait “Clearing Winter Storm” is one of the most unique portraits I have ever seen. It is a picture taken in Yosemite National Park, in California. The most magnificent fact about the photo is that the shot was taken at the perfect time - as the clouds were rolling in, before visibility decreased, and the photographer seems to be in the perfect position. Ansel Adams mastered photography captured nature in its most beautiful state, created in the essence of God. 

            I view the enormous boulder on the right side as the focal point of the portrait. The boulder and the clouds are the lightest shade in the portrait; thus being the easiest to see and decipher. The boulder points out in such a way that it seems as though it is from a story in the Bible about a man climbing on top of a mountain trying to reach God. The waterfall makes the eye concentrate more closely on the boulder, and indicates nature in its essence. The light that has not been taken by the storm still remains on the boulder, which is why we can still see the waterfall. The top of the boulder seems like a place that can never be reached by man, as if God protects it. God Protects the boulder with a fortress made up of the forests that lie below it, the waterfall guarding it, and the steepness of the boulder itself. It is a fortress unattainable that God created to preserve nature.  To me, the boulder represents finding the road to Heaven. It is an extremely difficult journey and takes much dedication, but once you make it “up there”; it is the best feeling a man can achieve. The secondary focal points represent the difficult journey of making it to the top.

            As a secondary focal point the clouds stand out because it makes me sense ambiguity. Seeing the clouds gives me a certain sense of uncertainty. The clouds are bringing in a storm where one would be unsure of its powerful affects; thus showing that nature can be destructive. Along with this idea, the waterfall points to me nature in its beauty and essence. It implies that nature, no matter how powerful or pristine, harmful or beneficial, dangerous or relaxing it can be, it is still beautiful. But, viewing something as beautiful can be a very treacherous mistake without knowing its effects. For instance, the waterfall is beautiful, but it is deceiving because it has the power to kill. Many beautiful things in nature are often very dangerous, such as a volcano or a tornado. Another very intriguing focal point is the valley that sits below the enormous mountains and boulders. The valley is endless; it is somewhere where only the mountains can see the exit to, not any human.

            These focal points make the scene look as if it has been there for all of existence but never touched by a human. Since it is so pristine and unique, it represents beauty but at the same time darkness. God created Heaven as something you have to achieve. For man, reaching Heaven can be achieved by being a good person with moral qualities, by helping others, and by living his life with a full dedication to God. It is not easy, just as in order to make it to the top of the boulder, you have to dedicate yourself and work towards that goal. Making it to the top of the boulder is reaching the light, but getting there is symbolic of darkness since many dangerous paths would be crossed.

            The portrait depicts nature at its fullest. It is beautiful, but can be very destructive to man. Nature was designed by God, and preserved by God with its many qualities that make it defensive. The beauty of nature can be very deceiving because of its many dangers that lie within it. The darkness represents the dangers such as the valley, the waterfall, the clouds, and the steep boulder. The light is reaching the top of the boulder, being symbolic of reaching Heaven – a difficult journey, but if you make it, it would be worth it in the end.

 

 

 

Comments (4)

Joe Essid said

at 5:51 pm on Sep 26, 2009

Here I like the close look. I do wonder if you found 10 observations or implications. I found nine, a few more likely claims that implications. The difference? The claim comes from you and draws a conclusion. The implication is a claim that you think comes from the object you study, such as "Adams' combination of beauty and a perilous waterfall implies that nature can be dangerous."

The word "shows" indicates implication. Try some others to mix things up, because some version of "show" gets used heavily. How about some of these signal phrases? "Implies, indicates, points to, reveals," and many more you can brainstorm.

Ryan Papera said

at 4:07 pm on Sep 29, 2009

I felt the first sentence was very powerful, but you used the word you. You need to be careful when you are using words like "you" and "I".

I also think you should fix your shorthands like photo. Change it to photograph. This is supposed to be a more serious writing and that kind of shorthand should be kept to the blog.

The descriptive language at the end of your introduction was very good. You should use more sentences like it.

The introduction begins to explain why you liked this picture, but I feel like you need to explain it more.

Jane D said

at 4:14 pm on Sep 29, 2009

Mikey Boo Boo,

Here are my notes on your project:
-point of departure? yes, but it's not really clear. I could use some clarification, maybe beef up your intro.
-sentence that expresses thesis: "Ansel Adams depicted nature at its fullest - made by God and presented by God."
-->I think this needs a little more added to it. Also this "God" them you start here is present throughout your whole paper, so I think it should be more prominent in the intro.
-why? or how? in the thesis - ...i can't see one
-weak thesis traps: 1. makes no claim
2. statement of fact
5. overly broad claim
-Honestly, I am really confused with your thesis. I think you should follow Dr. Essid's advice and try to find some more implications instead of claims. Here are my thoughts for how you should reword your thesis/intro. I would first add a reference or two to God before your thesis statement instead of just throwing it in there. Also, add a little you in the intro. It seems so drab and cold right now, spice it up with a little petrakis flava. Here's my revised thesis: Ansel Adams' master photography captureed nature in its most beautiful state, created in the essence of God. It sounds a little pretentious and may not be where you are trying to go at all, but it's just a thought. LUV U BOO HOLLA @ MI SUMTYME SOON!

Ryan Papera said

at 9:51 pm on Sep 30, 2009

I also agree with Essid. I have looked and only found 7-8 claims about the picture you chose. Even though 10 is an arbitrary number, i feel more would only benefit you.

You don't have permission to comment on this page.